Plain-English takeaways from real papers, organized by the design decisions you face. Every claim links to its source.
Auto-act on high-confidence, reversible steps; ask first on uncertain or costly ones; always offer a quick dismiss.
2 papers · agents · controlShow confidence where it varies meaningfully case to case, and visually flag low-confidence answers.
2 papers · trust · uncertaintyOnly explain when the explanation is quick to verify; don't use explanations as decoration to boost acceptance.
2 papers · trust · explanationsFor high-stakes decisions, ask for the user's own take first, then reveal the AI suggestion.
1 paper · trust · overrelianceTime suggestions to natural pauses, and make them quick to scan and to reject.
1 paper · copilots · attentionState accuracy and typical failures plainly at first use, and pick the error type your users tolerate best.
2 papers · onboarding · trustMake every AI result editable or adjustable; even small controls boost adoption after errors.
2 papers · control · adoptionPair chat with examples, templates and structured controls instead of a lone empty prompt field.
1 paper · chat-vs-gui · promptingOnboard with what the AI is good and bad at, plus what it was optimized for, not model internals.
1 paper · onboarding · mental-modelsKeep defaults neutral on contested topics and make it easy to see and change the AI's stance.
1 paper · writing · ethicsLink each claim to its source inline and make checking one click; don't treat a citation list as proof.
1 paper · search · verificationDesign for novices first: surface best-practice suggestions where newcomers struggle, and keep them optional for experts.
2 papers · productivity · strategy