← All questions

Every paper we cite

33 research papers behind the 25 design questions, 20 of them tested with large language models. Each one links to the questions it supports.

33 papers
  1. Navigating the Jagged Technological Frontier: Field Experimental Evidence of the Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Knowledge Worker Productivity and Quality

    Fabrizio Dell'Acqua, Edward McFowland III, Ethan Mollick, et al. · 2026 · Organization Science (2026); first released as HBS Working Paper 24-013 (2023)

    field experimentTested with LLMs

  2. Cocoa: Co-Planning and Co-Execution with AI Agents

    K. J. Kevin Feng, Kevin Pu, Matt Latzke, et al. · 2026 · CHI 2026 (arXiv:2412.10999v4)

    system evaluationTested with LLMs

  3. The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge Workers

    Hao-Ping (Hank) Lee, Advait Sarkar, Lev Tankelevitch, et al. · 2025 · CHI 2025

    surveyTested with LLMs

  4. Magentic-UI: Towards Human-in-the-loop Agentic Systems

    Hussein Mozannar, Gagan Bansal, Cheng Tan, Adam Fourney, et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2507.22358 (Microsoft Research, 2025)

    system evaluationTested with LLMs

  5. Large Language Models Help Humans Verify Truthfulness—Except When They Are Convincingly Wrong

    Chenglei Si, Navita Goyal, Sherry Tongshuang Wu, et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2310.12558v2 (Apr 2024)

    experimentTested with LLMs

  6. Generative AI at Work

    Erik Brynjolfsson, Danielle Li, Lindsey Raymond · 2024 · arXiv:2304.11771v2 (revised Nov 2024)

    field studyTested with LLMs

  7. Generation Probabilities Are Not Enough: Uncertainty Highlighting in AI Code Completions

    Helena Vasconcelos, Gagan Bansal, Adam Fourney, Q. Vera Liao, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan · 2024 · ACM TOCHI (preprint, arXiv:2302.07248v3, Nov 2024)

    experimentTested with LLMs

  8. Reading Between the Lines: Modeling User Behavior and Costs in AI-Assisted Programming

    Hussein Mozannar, Gagan Bansal, Adam Fourney, Eric Horvitz · 2024 · arXiv:2210.14306v5 (revised Apr 2024)

    observational studyTested with LLMs

  9. Fakes of Varying Shades: How Warning Affects Human Perception and Engagement Regarding LLM Hallucinations

    Mahjabin Nahar, Haeseung Seo, Eun-Ju Lee, et al. · 2024 · COLM 2024

    experimentTested with LLMs

  10. Believing Anthropomorphism: Examining the Role of Anthropomorphic Cues on Trust in Large Language Models

    Michelle Cohn, Mahima Pushkarna, Gbolahan O. Olanubi, et al. · 2024 · CHI 2024 (author version, arXiv:2405.06079)

    experimentTested with LLMs

  11. People are skeptical of headlines labeled as AI-generated, even if true or human-made, because they assume full AI automation

    Sacha Altay, Fabrizio Gilardi · 2024 · PNAS Nexus 2024

    experimentTested with LLMs

  12. “I'm Not Sure, But...”: Examining the Impact of Large Language Models' Uncertainty Expression on User Reliance and Trust

    Sunnie S. Y. Kim, Q. Vera Liao, Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Stephanie Ballard, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan · 2024 · FAccT 2024

    experimentTested with LLMs

  13. Does Writing with Language Models Reduce Content Diversity?

    Vishakh Padmakumar, He He · 2024 · ICLR 2024

    experimentTested with LLMs

  14. “It's a Fair Game”, or Is It? Examining How Users Navigate Disclosure Risks and Benefits When Using LLM-Based Conversational Agents

    Zhiping Zhang, Michelle Jia, Hao-Ping (Hank) Lee, et al. · 2024 · CHI 2024

    qualitative studyTested with LLMs

  15. Explanations Can Reduce Overreliance on AI Systems During Decision-Making

    Helena Vasconcelos, Matthew Jörke, Madeleine Grunde-McLaughlin, et al. · 2023 · CSCW 2023 (arXiv 2022)

    experimentPre-LLM

  16. Why Johnny Can't Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM Prompts

    J.D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, Richmond Y. Wong, Bjoern Hartmann, Qian Yang · 2023 · CHI 2023

    qualitative studyTested with LLMs

  17. Co-Writing with Opinionated Language Models Affects Users' Views

    Maurice Jakesch, Advait Bhat, Daniel Buschek, Lior Zalmanson, Mor Naaman · 2023 · CHI 2023

    experimentTested with LLMs

  18. Do Users Write More Insecure Code with AI Assistants?

    Neil Perry, Megha Srivastava, Deepak Kumar, Dan Boneh · 2023 · CCS 2023

    experimentTested with LLMs

  19. Evaluating Verifiability in Generative Search Engines

    Nelson F. Liu, Tianyi Zhang, Percy Liang · 2023 · Findings of EMNLP 2023

    auditTested with LLMs

  20. Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence

    Shakked Noy, Whitney Zhang · 2023 · Science 381 (6654), 2023

    experimentTested with LLMs

  21. Comparing Traditional and LLM-based Search for Consumer Choice: A Randomized Experiment

    Sofia Eleni Spatharioti, David M. Rothschild, Daniel G. Goldstein, Jake M. Hofman · 2023 · arXiv:2307.03744v2 (Nov 2023)

    experimentTested with LLMs

  22. Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performance

    Gagan Bansal, Tongshuang Wu, Joyce Zhou, et al. · 2021 · CHI 2021 (arXiv 2020)

    experimentPre-LLM

  23. Artificial intelligence in communication impacts language and social relationships

    Jess Hohenstein, Dominic DiFranzo, Rene F. Kizilcec, et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2102.05756v1 (2021); later in Scientific Reports

    experimentPre-LLM

  24. To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-making

    Zana Buçinca, Maja Barbara Malaya, Krzysztof Z. Gajos · 2021 · CSCW 2021

    experimentPre-LLM

  25. Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Making

    Yunfeng Zhang, Q. Vera Liao, Rachel K. E. Bellamy · 2020 · FAT* 2020

    experimentPre-LLM

  26. "Hello AI": Uncovering the Onboarding Needs of Medical Practitioners for Human-AI Collaborative Decision-Making

    Carrie J. Cai, Samantha Winter, David Steiner, Lauren Wilcox, Michael Terry · 2019 · CSCW 2019

    qualitative studyPre-LLM

  27. Will You Accept an Imperfect AI? Exploring Designs for Adjusting End-user Expectations of AI Systems

    Rafal Kocielnik, Saleema Amershi, Paul N. Bennett · 2019 · CHI 2019

    experimentPre-LLM

  28. Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction

    Saleema Amershi, Dan Weld, Mihaela Vorvoreanu, et al. · 2019 · CHI 2019

    guidelinesPre-LLM

  29. Resilient Chatbots: Repair Strategy Preferences for Conversational Breakdowns

    Zahra Ashktorab, Mohit Jain, Q. Vera Liao, Justin D. Weisz · 2019 · CHI 2019

    experimentPre-LLM

  30. Overcoming Algorithm Aversion: People Will Use Imperfect Algorithms If They Can (Even Slightly) Modify Them

    Berkeley J. Dietvorst, Joseph P. Simmons, Cade Massey · 2018 · Management Science

    experimentPre-LLM

  31. Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err

    Berkeley J. Dietvorst, Joseph P. Simmons, Cade Massey · 2015 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

    experimentPre-LLM

  32. Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance

    John D. Lee, Katrina A. See · 2004 · Human Factors

    reviewPre-LLM

  33. Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces

    Eric Horvitz · 1999 · CHI 1999

    principlesPre-LLM

No papers match. Try another search.

Also available as JSON.