Every paper we cite
33 research papers behind the 25 design questions, 20 of them tested with large language models. Each one links to the questions it supports.
Navigating the Jagged Technological Frontier: Field Experimental Evidence of the Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Knowledge Worker Productivity and Quality
Fabrizio Dell'Acqua, Edward McFowland III, Ethan Mollick, et al. · 2026 · Organization Science (2026); first released as HBS Working Paper 24-013 (2023)
field experimentTested with LLMs
Cocoa: Co-Planning and Co-Execution with AI Agents
K. J. Kevin Feng, Kevin Pu, Matt Latzke, et al. · 2026 · CHI 2026 (arXiv:2412.10999v4)
system evaluationTested with LLMs
The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge Workers
Hao-Ping (Hank) Lee, Advait Sarkar, Lev Tankelevitch, et al. · 2025 · CHI 2025
surveyTested with LLMs
Magentic-UI: Towards Human-in-the-loop Agentic Systems
Hussein Mozannar, Gagan Bansal, Cheng Tan, Adam Fourney, et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2507.22358 (Microsoft Research, 2025)
system evaluationTested with LLMs
Large Language Models Help Humans Verify Truthfulness—Except When They Are Convincingly Wrong
Chenglei Si, Navita Goyal, Sherry Tongshuang Wu, et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2310.12558v2 (Apr 2024)
experimentTested with LLMs
Generative AI at Work
Erik Brynjolfsson, Danielle Li, Lindsey Raymond · 2024 · arXiv:2304.11771v2 (revised Nov 2024)
field studyTested with LLMs
Generation Probabilities Are Not Enough: Uncertainty Highlighting in AI Code Completions
Helena Vasconcelos, Gagan Bansal, Adam Fourney, Q. Vera Liao, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan · 2024 · ACM TOCHI (preprint, arXiv:2302.07248v3, Nov 2024)
experimentTested with LLMs
Reading Between the Lines: Modeling User Behavior and Costs in AI-Assisted Programming
Hussein Mozannar, Gagan Bansal, Adam Fourney, Eric Horvitz · 2024 · arXiv:2210.14306v5 (revised Apr 2024)
observational studyTested with LLMs
Fakes of Varying Shades: How Warning Affects Human Perception and Engagement Regarding LLM Hallucinations
Mahjabin Nahar, Haeseung Seo, Eun-Ju Lee, et al. · 2024 · COLM 2024
experimentTested with LLMs
Believing Anthropomorphism: Examining the Role of Anthropomorphic Cues on Trust in Large Language Models
Michelle Cohn, Mahima Pushkarna, Gbolahan O. Olanubi, et al. · 2024 · CHI 2024 (author version, arXiv:2405.06079)
experimentTested with LLMs
People are skeptical of headlines labeled as AI-generated, even if true or human-made, because they assume full AI automation
Sacha Altay, Fabrizio Gilardi · 2024 · PNAS Nexus 2024
experimentTested with LLMs
“I'm Not Sure, But...”: Examining the Impact of Large Language Models' Uncertainty Expression on User Reliance and Trust
Sunnie S. Y. Kim, Q. Vera Liao, Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Stephanie Ballard, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan · 2024 · FAccT 2024
experimentTested with LLMs
Does Writing with Language Models Reduce Content Diversity?
Vishakh Padmakumar, He He · 2024 · ICLR 2024
experimentTested with LLMs
“It's a Fair Game”, or Is It? Examining How Users Navigate Disclosure Risks and Benefits When Using LLM-Based Conversational Agents
Zhiping Zhang, Michelle Jia, Hao-Ping (Hank) Lee, et al. · 2024 · CHI 2024
qualitative studyTested with LLMs
Explanations Can Reduce Overreliance on AI Systems During Decision-Making
Helena Vasconcelos, Matthew Jörke, Madeleine Grunde-McLaughlin, et al. · 2023 · CSCW 2023 (arXiv 2022)
experimentPre-LLM
Why Johnny Can't Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM Prompts
J.D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, Richmond Y. Wong, Bjoern Hartmann, Qian Yang · 2023 · CHI 2023
qualitative studyTested with LLMs
Co-Writing with Opinionated Language Models Affects Users' Views
Maurice Jakesch, Advait Bhat, Daniel Buschek, Lior Zalmanson, Mor Naaman · 2023 · CHI 2023
experimentTested with LLMs
Do Users Write More Insecure Code with AI Assistants?
Neil Perry, Megha Srivastava, Deepak Kumar, Dan Boneh · 2023 · CCS 2023
experimentTested with LLMs
Evaluating Verifiability in Generative Search Engines
Nelson F. Liu, Tianyi Zhang, Percy Liang · 2023 · Findings of EMNLP 2023
auditTested with LLMs
Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence
Shakked Noy, Whitney Zhang · 2023 · Science 381 (6654), 2023
experimentTested with LLMs
Comparing Traditional and LLM-based Search for Consumer Choice: A Randomized Experiment
Sofia Eleni Spatharioti, David M. Rothschild, Daniel G. Goldstein, Jake M. Hofman · 2023 · arXiv:2307.03744v2 (Nov 2023)
experimentTested with LLMs
Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performance
Gagan Bansal, Tongshuang Wu, Joyce Zhou, et al. · 2021 · CHI 2021 (arXiv 2020)
experimentPre-LLM
Artificial intelligence in communication impacts language and social relationships
Jess Hohenstein, Dominic DiFranzo, Rene F. Kizilcec, et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2102.05756v1 (2021); later in Scientific Reports
experimentPre-LLM
To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-making
Zana Buçinca, Maja Barbara Malaya, Krzysztof Z. Gajos · 2021 · CSCW 2021
experimentPre-LLM
Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Making
Yunfeng Zhang, Q. Vera Liao, Rachel K. E. Bellamy · 2020 · FAT* 2020
experimentPre-LLM
"Hello AI": Uncovering the Onboarding Needs of Medical Practitioners for Human-AI Collaborative Decision-Making
Carrie J. Cai, Samantha Winter, David Steiner, Lauren Wilcox, Michael Terry · 2019 · CSCW 2019
qualitative studyPre-LLM
Will You Accept an Imperfect AI? Exploring Designs for Adjusting End-user Expectations of AI Systems
Rafal Kocielnik, Saleema Amershi, Paul N. Bennett · 2019 · CHI 2019
experimentPre-LLM
Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction
Saleema Amershi, Dan Weld, Mihaela Vorvoreanu, et al. · 2019 · CHI 2019
guidelinesPre-LLM
Resilient Chatbots: Repair Strategy Preferences for Conversational Breakdowns
Zahra Ashktorab, Mohit Jain, Q. Vera Liao, Justin D. Weisz · 2019 · CHI 2019
experimentPre-LLM
Overcoming Algorithm Aversion: People Will Use Imperfect Algorithms If They Can (Even Slightly) Modify Them
Berkeley J. Dietvorst, Joseph P. Simmons, Cade Massey · 2018 · Management Science
experimentPre-LLM
Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err
Berkeley J. Dietvorst, Joseph P. Simmons, Cade Massey · 2015 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
experimentPre-LLM
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
John D. Lee, Katrina A. See · 2004 · Human Factors
reviewPre-LLM
Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces
Eric Horvitz · 1999 · CHI 1999
principlesPre-LLM
No papers match. Try another search.
Also available as JSON.